|
|
|
|
1 |
Automobile OEMs |
Cars & Utility Vehicles
Tractors
Trucks
Two Wheelers
|
11
6
3
7 |
2 |
Automobile
Ancillaries |
Electrical Parts
Engine Parts
Transmission
Ancillaries Others |
10
12
12
18 |
The sample plan for identification of best practices is as follows |
|
Industry |
Sample Plan |
|
utomobile OEMs
Automobile Ancillaries
Total |
11
14
25 |
Best in Class - Automobile OEMs
To identify the best in class among the various parameters, the automobile OEM companies have been grouped into the following categories.
• Cars & utility vehicles
• Tractors
• Trucks
• Two wheelers
Cars & Utility Vehicles |
Sl.no. |
Parameters |
Mean |
Median |
BIC* |
Cycle Time Metrics |
|
|
|
1 |
Procurement time
(no. of days) |
13.07 |
10.0 |
1.0 |
2 |
Production cycle time
(no. of days) |
3.5 |
3.0 |
1.0 |
3 |
Delivery time (no. of days) |
4.5 |
4.0 |
1.0 |
4 |
Total cycle time (no. of days) |
28.9 |
27.5 |
10.0 |
5 |
Cash to cash time (no. of days) |
41.9 |
37.5 |
13.0 |
6 |
Supply chain flexibility (%) |
15.3 |
15.0 |
30.0 |
|
Cost Metrics |
7 |
Total supply chain cost
(% of sales) |
6.6 |
6.5 |
3.0 |
8 |
In-bound transportation cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
1.7 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
9 |
Out-bound transportation cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
2.9 |
3.0 |
1.0 |
10 |
Warehousing cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
1.1 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
11 |
Inventory carrying cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
1.9 |
2.0 |
0.7 |
|
Service Quality Metrics |
12 |
% of on-time deliveries |
94.0 |
99.0 |
100.0 |
13 |
% of supplies made as per the
quantity ordered |
97.1 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
14 |
% of supply on desired quality |
99.6 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Asset Metrics |
15 |
Raw materials inventory
holding (No. of days) |
12.7 |
12.5 |
1.0 |
16 |
Work in progress inventory
holding (No. of days) |
2.3 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
17 |
Finished products inventory
holding (No. of days) |
7.7 |
3.0 |
1.0 |
18 |
Inventory turnover |
22.0 |
19.0 |
48.0 |
|
Tractors |
*BIC – Best in Class |
|
Sl.no. |
Parameters |
Mean |
Median |
BIC * |
Cycle Time Metrics |
|
|
|
1 |
|
6.2 |
6.0 |
3.0 |
2 |
Production cycle time (no. of days) |
3.8 |
3.5 |
2.0 |
3 |
Delivery time (no. of days) |
6.4 |
5.0 |
3.0 |
4 |
Total cycle time (no. of days) |
30.8 |
30.0 |
15.0 |
5 |
Cash to cash time (no. of days) |
56.3 |
52.5 |
30.0 |
6 |
Supply chain flexibility (%) |
18.4 |
10.0 |
50.0 |
|
Cost Metrics |
7 |
Total supply chain cost (% of sales) |
7.3 |
6.8 |
1.5 |
8 |
In-bound transportation cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
1.6 |
1.8 |
1.0 |
9 |
Out-bound transportation cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
2.2 |
2.5 |
0.3 |
10 |
Warehousing cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
1.3 |
1.5 |
0.3 |
11 |
Inventory carrying cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
2.2 |
2.0 |
0.5 |
|
Service Quality Metrics |
12 |
% of on-time deliveries |
89.3 |
94.0 |
99.0 |
13 |
% of supplies made as per the
quantity ordered |
96.6 |
98.0 |
100.0 |
14 |
% of supply on desired quality |
98.8 |
99.0 |
100.0 |
|
Asset Metrics |
15 |
Raw materials inventory holding
(No. of days) |
15.0 |
15.0 |
5.0 |
16 |
Work in progress inventory
holding (No. of days) |
14.3 |
5.5 |
3.0 |
17 |
Finished products inventory
holding (No. of days) |
19.0 |
30.0 |
1.0 |
18 |
Inventory turnover |
11.3 |
12.0 |
13.0 |
|
Trucks |
Sl.no. |
Parameters |
Mean |
Median |
BIC * |
Cycle Time Metrics |
|
|
|
1 |
Procurement time (no. of days) |
17.3 |
20.0 |
7.0 |
2 |
Production cycle time (no. of days) |
14.0 |
12.0 |
10.0 |
3 |
Delivery time (no. of days) |
9.7 |
5.0 |
3.0 |
4 |
Total cycle time (no. of days) |
40.0 |
45.0 |
15.0 |
5 |
Cash to cash time (no. of days) |
55.0 |
60.0 |
45.0 |
6 |
Supply chain flexibility (%) 15.0 15.0 20.0 |
15.0 |
15.0 |
20.0 |
|
Cost Metrics |
7 |
Total supply chain cost
(% of sales) |
11.7 |
11.0 |
9.5 |
8 |
In-bound transportation cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.0 |
9 |
Out-bound transportation cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
3.2 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
10 |
Warehousing cost (% of total
supply chain cost) |
3.2 |
3.5 |
2.0 |
11 |
Inventory carrying cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
2.2 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
|
Service Quality Metrics |
12 |
% of on-time deliveries |
95.0 |
95.0 |
100.0 |
13 |
% of supplies made as per the
quantity ordered |
99.3 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
14 |
% of supply on desired quality |
99.2 |
99.5 |
100.0 |
|
Asset Metrics |
15 |
Raw materials inventory
holding (No. of days) |
23.3 |
15.0 |
5.0 |
16 |
Work in progress inventory
holding (No. of days) |
7.0 |
7.0 |
5.0 |
17 |
Finished products inventory
holding (No. of days) |
9.3 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
18 |
Inventory turnover |
11.0 |
11.0 |
20. |
|
2 Wheelers |
Sl.no. |
Parameters |
Mean |
Median |
BIC * |
Cycle Time Metrics |
|
|
|
1 |
Procurement time (no. of days) |
9.8 |
7.0 |
3.0 |
2 |
Production cycle time (no. of days) |
6.8 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3 |
Delivery time (no. of days) |
4.6 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
4 |
Total cycle time (no. of days) |
14.6 |
12.0 |
10.0 |
5 |
Cash to cash time (no. of days) |
30.0 |
27.5 |
20.0 |
6 |
Supply chain flexibility (%) |
15.7 |
12.0 |
25.0 |
|
Cost Metrics |
7 |
Total supply chain cost (% of sales) |
6.6 |
7.0 |
4.0 |
8 |
In-bound transportation cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
2.1 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
9 |
Out-bound transportation cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
2.3 |
2.5 |
1.0 |
10 |
Warehousing cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
11 |
Inventory carrying cost
(% of total supply chain cost) |
1.3 |
1.5 |
0.5 |
|
Service Quality Metrics |
12 |
% of on-time deliveries |
94.4 |
99.8 |
100.0 |
13 |
% of supplies made as per the
quantity ordered |
98.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
14 |
% of supply on desired quality |
99.9 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Asset Metrics |
15 |
Raw materials inventory holding
(No. of days) |
21.3 |
21.5 |
10.0 |
16 |
Work in progress inventory holding
(No. of days) |
4.0 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
17 |
Finished products inventory holding
(No. of days) |
8.6 |
1.8 |
1.0 |
18 |
Inventory turnover |
13.0 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
|
Identification of Leaders
Based on the feedback from the companies about their supply chain practices, the top three companies for each of the parameters within the different sub categories were listed down. Companies which ranked the maximum number of times among the top 3 for the different parameters were identified as leaders for the respective sub category.
The practices were grouped under different heads and respondents across the leader organisations were asked to identify / indicate the practices that they normally undertake.
The best practices were identified within the following categories:
• Strategy
• Marketing
• Procurement
• Manufacturing
• Quality
• Logistics
• Information Technology
The leaders identified belonged to the following industry types: |
Industry Type |
Industry Sub Types |
No of Contacts |
Automobile |
|
|
|
OEMs |
Cars & Utility Vehicles |
4 |
|
|
Tractors |
2 |
|
|
Trucks |
1 |
|
|
Two Wheelers |
4 |
|
|
Sub Total |
|
11 |
Auto Ancillary |
Engine Parts |
3 |
|
|
Transmission |
4 |
|
|
Electrical |
3 |
|
|
Ancillaries Others |
4 |
|
|
Sub Total |
|
14 |
|
Total |
|
25 |
|
Best Practices – Auto OEMs
Personnel from 11 automobile manufacturers (identified as the leaders in different supply chain metrics) across the country were contacted during this phase of the study.
Strategy |
Practices |
% of Respondents |
Outsourcing non core activities |
72.7 |
Integration of SCM Processes |
63.6 |
Benchmarking SCM performance |
54.5 |
SCM Performance measurement |
27.3 |
SCM as business driver |
18.2 |
|
Base: 11
Of the companies contacted 72 percent of them as a strategy outsource their non-core activities. Only around 18 percent of the companies contacted consider Supply Chain Management as a business driver.
Marketing |
Practices |
% of Respondents |
Customer service measurement |
90.9 |
Demand Planning |
81.8 |
Advance Forecasting tools |
72.7 |
Postponement Strategy |
18.2 |
Pull Strategy |
18.2 |
|
Base: 11
During the survey it was found that 90 percent of the companies were using customer service measurement, while around 81 percent of them were using demand planning. Not many of them contacted were using pull and postponement strategies for marketing.
Procurement |
Practices |
% of Respondents |
Vendor Rating |
90.9 |
Self Certified Vendors |
81.8 |
Annual Vendor Meet |
72.7 |
Vendor Managed Inventory |
72.7 |
JIT Suppliers |
72.7 |
Early Supplier Involvement |
72.7 |
MRP Systems |
63.6 |
Strategic Supplier Relationship |
54.5 |
Global Sourcing |
54.5 |
Single Sourcing |
54.5 |
E- Procurement |
45.5 |
Standardization of Similar Parts |
45.5 |
Contract Manufacturing |
45.5 |
Target Costing |
45.5 |
Suppliers Base Relationship |
36.4 |
Aggregate Buying |
36.4 |
Reverse Auctions |
18.2 |
|
Base: 11
Vendor rating is practiced by around 90 percent of the companies contacted while 80 percent of the companies contacted certify their vendors. Reverse Auctions are yet to find a foothold for procurement and only 18 percent of the companies contacted seem to be using them.
Manufacturing |
Practices |
% of Respondents |
Preventive Maintenance |
81.8 |
Product Layout |
72.7 |
Set-up Time Reduction |
63.6 |
Group Technology |
45.5 |
Lean Manufacturing |
36.4 |
|
Base: 11
During the primary survey it was evident that around 82 percent of the companies contacted were using preventive maintenance. Around 73 percent of the companies contacted were using product layout for manufacturing of the products.
Quality |
Practices |
% of respondents |
Quality Improvement Tools |
81.8 |
Total Quality Management |
72.7 |
IS/QS/TS Certification |
72.7 |
Statistical Quality Control |
63.6 |
Self Certification of Products |
54.5 |
Quality Improvement of Vendors |
54.5 |
Failure Mode Effects Analysis |
45.5 |
Quality Function Deployment |
36.4 |
Six Sigma Quality |
27.3 |
Kaizen |
27.3 |
|
Base: 11
Around 82 percent of the companies contacted use quality improvement tools for improvement of the quality. Total quality management and IS / QS / TS certification are followed by around 73 percent of the companies contacted. Only around 27 percent of the companies contacted seem to use six sigma quality and Kaizen tools for quality improvement.
Logistics |
Practices |
% of respondents |
Inventory & Control |
90.9 |
Outsourcing Logistics |
81.8 |
Traffic & Transportation |
72.7 |
Warehousing & Storage |
72.7 |
Tracking and Tracing Systems |
54.5 |
Global Logistics |
54.5 |
E- Logistics |
36.4 |
Reverse Logistics |
36.4 |
Distribution Resource planning Systems
|
18.2 |
Milk Run Collections |
18.2 |
|
Base: 11
During the primary survey it was evident that around 91 percent of the companies contacted were practicing control of inventory. Only around 18 percent of the companies contacted use DRP systems and milk run collections.
Information Technology |
Practices |
% of respondents |
ERP Systems |
81.8 |
CAD / CAM |
63.6 |
Web Technology |
54.5 |
Electronic Data Exchange / Fund Transfer |
36.4 |
SCM Software |
27.3 |
Bar- Coding |
27.3 |
CRM Software |
18.2 |
Global Positioning System |
18.2 |
Warehouse Management System |
9.1 |
|
Base: 11
ERP systems are presently being used by around 82 percent of the companies contacted. New technologies like Radio Frequency Identification & Detection (RFID) are yet to be used by any of the companies contacted.
|